Prevalence and determinants of female genital mutilation: current insights from ten at-risk countries in Sub-Saharan Africa

女性生殖器切割的流行情况和决定因素:来自撒哈拉以南非洲十个高危国家的最新见解

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), several women and children are significantly affected by female genital mutilation (FGM), but there is limited studies on the prevalence and determinants of FGM due to a combination of factors, including cultural-political barriers, funding constraints, and ethical concerns. This study aims to address this gap by examining the current prevalence and determinants of FGM in ten at-risk countries in SSA. METHODS: This cross-sectional study utilised Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data of 129,182 women aged 15-49 years from ten at-risk countries. The included countries are Guinea, Mali, Sierra Leone, Burkina Faso, Gambia, Mauritania, Ethiopia, Nigeria, Chad, and Liberia. Data were sample-weighted and our dependent variable was mutilation status whereas women's socio-demographic characteristics constituted the independent variables. Multivariable modified Poisson regression analyses were performed, with a p-value threshold of < 0.05 used to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: The pooled prevalence of FGM across the ten Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries was 53.5% (95% CI: 52.3-54.7). Older women demonstrated a higher likelihood of having undergone mutilation, with adjusted prevalence ratios (APRs) increasing from 2.69 (95% CI: 2.66-2.75) among women aged 20-24 to 2.86 (95% CI: 2.80-2.92) among those aged 45-49. Women with no formal education were significantly more likely to have undergone mutilation compared to those with secondary education or higher (APR = 2.53, 95% CI: 2.51-2.56). Rural residency was strongly associated with a higher prevalence of FGM (APR = 2.59, 95% CI: 2.56-2.61), as was unemployment compared to active employment (APR = 2.56, 95% CI: 2.54-2.58). Furthermore, women from poorer households were more likely to have undergone mutilation compared to those from wealthier households (APR = 2.66, 95% CI: 2.62-2.69). CONCLUSION: The overall FGM prevalence of 53.5% indicates a significant problem. Urgent interventions are needed and should consider significant factors including older age, lower education level, rural residency, women unemployment and poverty.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。