Persistent use of nitrous oxide for anaesthesia in European hospitals despite its harmfulness to the climate - how emission taxation can achieve the coupling of cost-effectiveness and climate protection: observational study

尽管氧化亚氮对气候有害,但欧洲医院仍持续使用氧化亚氮进行麻醉——排放税如何实现成本效益与气候保护的结合:一项观察性研究

阅读:4

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health care has the intrinsic obligation to preserve health. This concept is also applicable to planetary health. Nitrous oxide (N(2)O) lacks clinical indications in modern anaesthesia, while it is a high-potential greenhouse gas. Its seemingly low cost contrasts with the consequential externalised socio-economic costs due to its contribution to the climate crisis, which is approximately €698 per emitted ton of CO(2) equivalent. This difference can be internalised through emission taxation. In this study, we aim to evaluate how much N(2)O - total amount and converted to CO(2) equivalent - is used at a German university hospital and compare this amount to that used at European hospitals. Furthermore, how the cost of N(2)O usage changes under different emission taxation scenarios is calculated. METHODS: This trial was a retrospective observational study at a German university hospital with approximately 1,250 beds between 2016 and 2020. Additionally, five European hospitals from the Health Care Without Harm Network were used for comparison from a European perspective. The main outcome parameters were the amount of N(2)O used, in total and converted to CO(2) equivalent, and the total cost at emission taxation of €0, €25, €55 and €698 per ton CO(2) equivalent. RESULTS: At the peak, 2,104 tCO(2) equivalent in N(2)O was emitted in 2019. The actual cost was €14,040 in this year, while the corresponding socio-economic damage due to the climate crisis was almost €1.5 million. Other European hospitals showed comparable amounts of emissions. CONCLUSIONS: The annual peak amount of emitted N(2)O corresponded to the total annual greenhouse gas emission of 188 people in Germany. To achieve a drastic reduction in use, the abandonment of recommendations by anaesthesiologic societies appears necessary, in addition to an internalisation of future costs via emission taxation, which will cause inadequate cost for a medication without relevant benefit or indication. To that end, the inclusion of health sector emissions within national or international greenhouse gas taxation, for example, the European Union Emissions Trading System, appears necessary and expedient in view of the urgent need to address the ecological transformation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered with the German Clinical Trials Register, identifier DRKS00024973 on 12/04/2021.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。