Examining the prevalence of reproductive tract infections (RTIs) and their correlation with knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP): a cross-sectional study among university-affiliated women

一项针对大学附属女性的横断面研究,旨在调查生殖道感染(RTI)的患病率及其与知识、态度和行为(KAP)的相关性。

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reproductive tract infections (RTIs) remain a major public health concern among women of reproductive age, but limited evidence exists on their association with knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) in university settings. This study examined the prevalence of RTIs and their relationship with KAP and sociodemographic factors among university-affiliated women. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from October 2023 to March 2024 among 457 women aged 18-48 years at a large comprehensive university in Tianjin, China, including students, faculty, administrative staff, and contracted workers. Participants were recruited through stratified convenience sampling and completed a validated 23-item KAP questionnaire, followed by standardized clinical examination and standardized clinical assessment with targeted laboratory testing. Associations between KAP, sociodemographic characteristics, and RTI prevalence were assessed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests. RESULTS: The mean KAP score was 50 (SD 14); 34.5% of participants were categorized as low, 46.3% as medium, and 19.0% as high. Overall RTI prevalence was 37.6%, with endometritis (17.7%) and salpingitis (17.2%) most common. Higher KAP levels were inversely associated with RTI prevalence (p < 0.001). Marked gradients were observed by education and expenditure: prevalence was 24.5% among women with a master's degree or above versus 50.8% among college students, and 70.7% among those with monthly expenditure < 2,000 RMB. CONCLUSIONS: Institutional affiliation alone did not confer adequate sexual health; persistent occupational and socioeconomic gradients indicate that structural socioeconomic and cultural barriers-rather than educational access per se-drive disparities. Equity-oriented, culturally appropriate, KAP-based interventions and longitudinal evaluation are warranted.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。