E6/E7 Similarity to Human Papillomavirus Prototypes and Performance of HPV Testing by Cobas 4800 HPV Test and Anyplex II HPV HR

E6/E7 与人乳头瘤病毒原型株的相似性以及 Cobas 4800 HPV 检测和 Anyplex II HPV HR 检测的 HPV 检测性能

阅读:1

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) genotype classification relies on DNA sequence similarity to reference (prototype) sequences. Most HPV assays used for cervical cancer screening were clinically validated against European HPV prototypes. However, the impact of HPV sequence polymorphisms on test performance remains unexplored. We evaluated whether sequence variation in E6/E7 relative to HPV prototypes affects test performance by analyzing cervicovaginal samples from 990 women enrolled (2019-2022) across Belgium, Portugal, Brazil and Ecuador. Samples were tested using cobas, Anyplex, and next-generation sequencing (Ampliseq/Ion Torrent targeting E6/E7). Sequence variation was defined as the proportion of single nucleotide polymorphisms across E6/E7 relative to reference sequence. Sequence variation was, on average, higher in HPV-negative than HPV-positive samples for HPV16 (0.46% vs 0.13%) and HPV18 (0.44% vs 0.37%) using cobas. Similar patterns were observed with Anyplex (HPV16: 0.78% vs 0.13%, HPV33: 0.66% vs 0.40%, HPV58: 0.79% vs 0.53, and HPV66: 1.14% vs 0.25%). For HPV45, sequence variation was, on average, higher in HPV-positive than HPV-negative samples when tested with Anyplex (0.87% vs 0.43%). For HPV types 18, 31, 35, 39, 51, 52, 56, 59 and 68, the mean sequence variation was similar between HPV-negative and HPV-positive samples using Anyplex. Our findings show that sequence variation relative to prototypes may impact test performance.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。