Potential Clinical and Economic Impacts of Cutbacks in the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief Program in South Africa : A Modeling Analysis

削减总统艾滋病紧急救援计划在南非项目预算的潜在临床和经济影响:一项建模分析

阅读:3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Future U.S. congressional funding for the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) program is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical and economic impacts of abruptly scaling back PEPFAR funding ($460 million) from South Africa's total HIV budget ($2.56 billion) in 2024. DESIGN: Model-based analysis of 100%, 50%, and 0% PEPFAR funding with proportional decreases in HIV diagnosis rates (26.0, 24.3, 22.6 per 100 person-years [PY]), 1-year treatment engagement (people with HIV [PWH] receiving/initiating antiretroviral therapy: 92.2%/80.4%, 87.1%/76.0%, 82.0%/71.5%), and primary prevention (4.0%, 2.2%, 0.5% reduction in incidence with no programming [1.24 per 100 PY]). DATA SOURCES: Published HIV care continuum; PEPFAR funding estimates. TARGET POPULATION: South African adults (HIV prevalence, 16.2%; incidence, 0.32 per 100 PY). TIME HORIZON: Lifetime. PERSPECTIVE: Health care sector. INTERVENTION: PEPFAR funded 100% (PEPFAR_100%), 50% (PEPFAR_50%), or 0% (PEPFAR_0%). OUTCOME MEASURES: HIV infections, life expectancy, and lifetime costs (2023 U.S. dollars). RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: With current HIV programming (PEPFAR_100%), 1 190 000 new infections are projected over 10 years; life expectancy would be 61.42 years for PWH, with lifetime costs of $11 180 per PWH. Reduced PEPFAR funding (PEPFAR_50% and PEPFAR_0%) would add 286 000 and 565 000 new infections, respectively. PWH would lose 2.02 and 3.71 life-years with nominal lifetime cost reductions of $620 per PWH and $1140 per PWH that would be offset at the population level by more PWH requiring treatment for infection. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: Countries with similar HIV prevalence and greater reliance on PEPFAR funding could experience disproportionately higher incremental infections and survival losses. LIMITATION: Budget fungibility and exact programmatic implications of reducing PEPFAR funding are unknown. CONCLUSION: Abrupt PEPFAR cutbacks would have immediate and long-term detrimental effects on epidemiologic and clinical HIV outcomes in South Africa. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。