Time to inclusion of selected medicines for priority diseases in National Essential Medicines Lists compared with the WHO Model List

将特定药物纳入国家基本药物目录(用于治疗重点疾病)所需时间与世界卫生组织示范目录进行比较

阅读:1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The WHO maintains a Model List of Essential Medicines, which guides countries in developing their National Essential Medicines List (NEML) to improve access to medicines. We aimed to assess the time it took for countries to adjust their NEMLs when medicines were added or deleted from the WHO Model List and if this differed between priority diseases. METHODS: We extracted medicines added or deleted from the WHO Model List (2007-2021) for selected priority diseases: diabetes, hepatitis C, HIV, oncology and tuberculosis. These medicines were compared with NEMLs from 20 countries; reimbursement lists (RLs) were used in the absence of an NEML. The time to inclusion in NEMLs/RLs and the percentage of included medicines in the most recent NEML/RL were assessed. RESULTS: 90 medicines were added, and 15 medicines were deleted from the WHO Model List. Low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) mostly included medicines in NEMLs after their addition to the WHO Model List (median: 1 year), and high-income countries prior to addition (median: -9 years). Medicines for HIV (62%) and tuberculosis (59%) were most frequently included in the most recent NEML/RL. High-income countries included the most medicines for diabetes (86%) and oncology (67%). CONCLUSIONS: The WHO Model List may be a guiding tool for selecting medicines in LMICs, although it is applied differently between the priority diseases included in the present study. More medicines could be included in NEMLs for non-communicable diseases, which impose a large health burden on LMICs, as a first step to ensure their sustainable access.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。