Abstract
The use of hormonal treatments for endometriosis has increased in recent years. Their effectiveness lies in creating a stable hormonal environment, reducing peripheral estrogen levels, and suppressing ovulation and menstruation. Although these agents do not cure endometriosis and symptoms often return after discontinuation, they effectively relieve pain in most cases and help prevent disease progression or recurrence. Women are therefore typically managed with long-term hormonal treatments, with or without surgery. However, this approach is unsuitable for those seeking natural pregnancy or undergoing IVF, as all hormonal treatments hinder conception. For women pursuing natural pregnancy, these treatments should be discontinued for about 1 year, the time needed to diagnose infertility. However, this suspension exposes women to the risk of recurrence or progression and is therefore clinically acceptable only if the woman has a reasonable likelihood of achieving pregnancy naturally. In women with endometriosis who are infertile and therefore require IVF, ovarian stimulation significantly raises estrogen levels-up to 10 times those of a natural cycle-potentially boosting the risk of endometriosis relapse. Evidence is reassuring on this issue even if some limited data suggest that ovarian stimulation may promote deep invasive endometriosis progression. Overall, physicians and patients must balance the chances of natural or ART-assisted pregnancy against the risk of disease recurrence or progression during treatment discontinuation or IVF. This choice is also complicated by the increased risk of severe pregnancy complications in women with endometriosis, possibly depending on the conception method. This review discusses the available evidence that can be helpful in guiding the decision-making process.