Does choice of neighborhood disadvantage index matter? An application with preterm birth disparities in North Carolina

选择社区劣势指数是否重要?以北卡罗来纳州早产差异为例

阅读:2

Abstract

Epidemiologists often investigate the impacts of neighborhood disadvantage (ND) on health using indices created from publicly available data. However, it is not clear how choice of ND index impacts results. We (1) determined commonly used ND indices in recent epidemiological research and (2) investigated how choice of index impacts the magnitude of the racial disparity in preterm birth (PTB) by level of ND. We reviewed abstracts in epidemiology journals and conferences from 2020 to 2023 to determine commonly used ND indices and assigned them to birth records for singleton live births with no birth defects to non-Hispanic (NH) Black and NH White birthing parents in North Carolina, 2016-2018. Prevalence differences in PTB per 100 births were estimated using linear binomial regression comparing births from NH Black and NH White birthing parents, stratified by ND index quartile. The most used indices in perinatal-specific research were the Neighborhood Deprivation Index, racial and economic Index of Concentration at the Extremes, Social Vulnerability Index, and Area Deprivation Index. We observed no significant differences in the magnitude of the Black-White disparity in PTB by ND index. While there were no notable differences in estimates, interpretation of results should consider the intent of an index and its components.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。