Technological Strategies for the Patient Experience in Emergency Departments: Scoping Review

急诊科患者体验的技术策略:范围界定综述

阅读:3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Technology has improved patient care in hospitals, enhancing the overall patient experience. However, digitalization raises questions on effectively integrating technological strategies to ensure assertive communication of information during emergency department (ED) journeys. Keeping patients well-informed boosts their service perception and satisfaction, a factor often neglected by institutions in EDs. OBJECTIVE: This paper analyzes relevant studies on technological strategies designed for EDs aimed at improving patient experience, focusing on communication and information access. We analyze the technologies, outcomes, impacts, and challenges of the strategies. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted using the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines and CADIMA tool. Searches were performed in Scopus, PubMed, IEEE Xplore, and CINAHL databases. Articles published from January 2018 to December 2024 were included. Quality appraisal was performed using the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool version 1.4. Three reviewers independently examined the title and abstract for eligibility based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: Sixteen eligible studies were included. Four technological strategy categories were identified: artificial intelligence-based, simulation-based, infrastructure and hardware technologies, and interfaces and information systems. Mobile and web applications were the main technologies adopted in the studies. CONCLUSIONS: Technological strategies hold significant potential to enhance patient experiences in EDs by providing real-time updates on medical status and care progress. However, their effectiveness depends on usability, literacy, and system design. Existing literature highlights the impact and challenges of deploying and using these strategies in EDs. However, no studies have systematically evaluated long-term outcomes or cost-effectiveness across diverse ED settings.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。