Abstract
OBJECTIVE: DESIGN: Traditional encounter-based analyses overlook downstream costs and complications that follow emergency department (ED) care. To enable more comprehensive evaluations, we developed standardised episode of care definitions for five common, high-cost conditions: chest pain, congestive heart failure (CHF), pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and suicidality.A two-round modified Delphi panel study was conducted following a literature review and evidence synthesis. Using structured surveys with anonymous feedback, panellists rated candidate criteria. To be retained in the final episode definitions, criteria were required to meet a predefined validity threshold without panellist disagreement. Data were analysed descriptively, and meeting deliberations were recorded and reviewed thematically. SETTING: Virtual, supported by an online survey platform. PARTICIPANTS: A multidisciplinary panel of 11 experts in emergency medicine and relevant clinical specialties with 9 members participating in each round. OUTCOMES: Criteria to determine inclusion, exclusion (including pre-trigger, post-trigger and event exclusion) and risk-adjustment standards for constructing ED-based episodes of care. RESULTS: Candidate criteria were presented to the panel by condition: 30 for chest pain, 54 for CHF, 30 for COPD, 79 for pneumonia and 375 for suicidality. Following deliberations and re-rating, the number of valid criteria was reduced, primarily in the episode exclusion category. Thematic analysis highlighted trade-offs between episode exclusion criteria and the use of risk adjustment to account for heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Operational definitions for ED-based episodes of care for five conditions were established. These may support healthcare administrators, policymakers and researchers in evaluating variation in ED care delivery and its downstream cost and outcomes.