Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Older adults are more likely than younger people to have multiple chronic health conditions and increased health and/or social needs. As older people generally prefer living at home in the community as they age and residential care can be expensive, there is a need for effective alternatives to residential care in the community. The objective of this review was to synthesize evidence about programs aimed at enabling older people with ongoing health and social care needs to remain in the community. METHODS: This review followed the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of effectiveness. Included studies reported on complex, multifactorial interventions that were based in the community and included more than one type of service. Six databases and gray literature were searched for published and unpublished research. Titles and abstracts, and full-text selections were screened by two or more reviewers and assessed for methodological quality using JBI critical appraisal tools. Results related to quality of life and healthcare outcomes were extracted. RESULTS: Fifty-five full text articles, reporting on 51 unique complex interventions, were included in the review. Studies were predominantly randomized controlled trials (n=24) and quasi-experimental studies (n=23), with five cohort and three case series studies included. The overall quality of the included studies was moderate. Key characteristics of the interventions included case management, care planning, a comprehensive assessment, and in-home visits. Comparative meta-analyses were completed for five of the outcomes (hospital admission, emergency department visits, long-term care use, primary care use and quality of life). The results showed effects in the direction of interventions for the number of hospital admissions and LTC use, however, none of the meta-analyses were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: There is little agreement about the effectiveness of complex interventions on quality of life and health system outcomes. Jurisdictional differences may make the integration of literature reporting on such interventions particularly difficult. There is an ongoing need to understand what helps older people with complex needs live well in the community and what level of health system engagement is optimal. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO reference number CRD42022324061.