Developing a Program Theory on Ventilator Weaning in Adult Intensive Care: Protocol for a Multimethods Study

成人重症监护呼吸机撤机方案理论的制定:一项多方法研究方案

阅读:5

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, mechanical ventilation and ventilator weaning have been widely researched. Nevertheless, rates of weaning failure remain high. According to the Medical Research Council framework, ventilator weaning is a complex intervention. While there are various guidelines on this, there is no abstract theoretical understanding that organizes the interventions, outcomes, and their contexts. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the interconnectedness of interventions, outcomes, and context in ventilator weaning of adult intensive care patients. METHODS: Using the approach of Funnell and Rogers, we develop a program theory for ventilator weaning in a multimethod study comprising 2 main steps. First, 3 literature reviews on interventions and outcomes, predictors of weaning failure, and patients' experiences were triangulated with stakeholder conversations. Using abduction, we then developed an initial program theory. Second, the initial theory will be revised in an iterative process. To this end, semistructured group discussions and workshops will be conducted, followed by a deductive thematic analysis and adaptation of our theory. This process will be repeated until stakeholder statements and data analyses are congruent with the program theory. RESULTS: The initial program theory developed in step 1 is presented in this protocol and serves as the basis for review and refinement in step 2. The results of this iterative process and the final program theory are expected in 2026. CONCLUSIONS: Following the Medical Research Council framework, a program theory on ventilator weaning will be developed in this study. This may enable a differentiated understanding of ventilator weaning and more sustainable and comprehensive research. The program theory emphasizes the interdisciplinary nature of ventilator weaning and supports health care professionals in combining interventions appropriately and evaluating relevant outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework YGJ3T; https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YGJ3T. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/83342.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。