Global burden, spatiotemporal disparities, and sex-specific trends of early- and late-onset Alzheimer's disease and other dementias: a comparative analysis and projections to 2035

全球疾病负担、时空差异以及早发性和晚发性阿尔茨海默病和其他痴呆症的性别差异趋势:一项比较分析和至2035年的预测

阅读:1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Early-onset Alzheimer's disease and other dementias (EOAD) and late-onset Alzheimer's disease and other dementias (LOAD) represent significant global disease burden challenges. However, previous studies have frequently overlooked differences in their spatial distribution, population characteristics, temporal trends, and healthcare demands. This study aims to systematically compare the burden of EOAD and LOAD at global and regional levels from 1990 to 2021, analyzing disparities in spatial patterns, demographic features, and temporal trajectories, while projecting future trends. METHODS: Data were extracted from the GBD 2021 database. EOAD was defined as age-standardized cases among individuals aged 40-64 years, and LOAD as those aged ≥ 65 years. Primary outcomes included incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Analyses covered global, Socio-Demographic Index (SDI) regions, and 21 regions from 1990 to 2021. Bayesian age-period-cohort (BAPC) modeling projected disease burdens to 2035. RESULTS: In 2021, LOAD demonstrated a substantially higher global burden than EOAD: incidence cases (8,455,150 [95% UI: 5,818,063-11,461,560] vs. 1,381,906 [894,768-1,963,453]), mortality cases (1,879,291 [471,472-4,968,222] vs. 73,386 [14,059-232,170]), and DALYs (32,558,570 [14,907,368-71,154,572] vs. 3,774,117 [1,696,439-8,881,154]). LOAD exhibited stronger female predominance globally compared to EOAD. From 1990 to 2021, LOAD burden showed an initial decline followed by resurgence, stabilizing overall, while EOAD displayed persistent gradual growth. EOAD had higher annualized percentage changes (AAPC) than LOAD: incidence (0.18% [95% CI: 0.14-0.21] vs. 0.03% [-0.02-0.07]), mortality (0.07% [0.04-0.10] vs. 0.01% [-0.02-0.04]), and DALYs (0.07% [0.05-0.09] vs. 0.03% [-0.00-0.06]). BAPC projections indicated LOAD burden will remain significantly higher than EOAD by 2035. Geographically, East Asia reported the highest absolute burden for both conditions, while Central Sub-Saharan Africa and Tropical Latin America showed peak ASIR, ASMR and AS-DALYs. South Asia exhibited the fastest growth rates. CONCLUSION: EOAD and LOAD demonstrate distinct spatial distributions, sex-specific patterns, and temporal trends. Differentiated strategies targeting these two conditions are urgently needed to achieve precision public health goals.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。