Development and validation of the healthcare access barrier scale (HABS)

医疗保健服务获取障碍量表(HABS)的开发与验证

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Measuring healthcare access barriers is crucial for improving service equity. However, existing tools often lack a holistic, process-integrated approach. This study addresses this gap by developing and validating the Healthcare Access Barriers Scale (HABS), a new instrument that holistically assesses barriers before, during, and after medical visits. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 2,009 Shanghai residents. HABS was developed based on Penchansky and Thomas's Theory of Access and Saurman's modification. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA, CFA) were used to assess its structure. Reliability and validity were tested using Cronbach's alpha and model fit indices. RESULTS: EFA and CFA supported a six-factor structure of the HABS, corresponding to six key dimensions of access barriers: unawareness, unavailability, inaccessibility, inadaptability, unaffordability, and unacceptability. The HABS demonstrated strong reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.974) and a good fit for the six-factor model (CFA: Comparative Fit Index [CFI] = 0.937, Tucker-Lewis Index [TLI] = 0.930, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation [RMSEA] = 0.069). The two most pronounced barriers were financial constraints (mean of unaffordability dimension = 3.26) and lack of awareness (unawareness = 3.19), highlighting cost burdens and health literacy gaps in this population. CONCLUSIONS: The HABS is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring perceived healthcare access barriers in urban populations, offering a more holistic, process-integrated assessment by capturing obstacles across the full continuum of care - before, during, and after healthcare visits. This unified scale can facilitate assessment of systematic barriers, comparisons across settings, and identification of target areas for intervention. Future use of the HABS may inform policies and programs aimed at improving access to health services and equity.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。