Comparing isoflurane and desflurane: A prospective randomised blinded clinical trial in horses undergoing elective surgery

比较异氟烷和地氟烷:一项针对接受择期手术的马匹的前瞻性随机双盲临床试验

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The recovery period is associated with the greatest risk of injury for horses undergoing anaesthesia. Recovery quality and duration can be influenced by the volatile agent. METHODS: This prospective, randomised blinded clinical investigation recruited 101 healthy client-owned horses undergoing elective surgery at one UK equine hospital. Anaesthesia was standardised, and horses were randomly assigned to receive desflurane or isoflurane for maintenance. Horses were ventilated to normocapnia and received dobutamine to maintain mean arterial blood pressure above 60 mmHg. All the patients received romifidine intravenously prior to recovery, which was timed and video recorded to allow offline blinded evaluation by two experienced clinicians. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between groups in haemodynamic support during anaesthesia or recovery quality. Desflurane horses recovered faster and made fewer attempts to stand. LIMITATIONS: Nonlinearity and lack of validation of the recovery scale limit reliability; however, in the absence of a validated instrument, this scoring system is widely used. CONCLUSION: Haemodynamic support required during anaesthesia and recovery quality were similar between agents. Desflurane horses recovered faster and required fewer attempts to stand, suggesting that this anaesthetic may lead to fewer recovery injuries and optimise workflow in the equine theatre.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。