Different Knots, Same Outcome: Evaluating the Role of Surgical Technique on Biliary Anastomotic Strictures After Liver Transplantation

不同的结,相同的结果:评估手术技巧对肝移植后胆道吻合口狭窄的影响

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biliary anastomotic strictures (BAS) after liver transplant (LT) are a significant contributor to post-transplant morbidity. Although surgical technique has been proposed as a risk factor, accurate evaluation of technique has been limited by inherent bias in conventional definitions for BAS. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of clinically significant BAS (csBAS) with absorbable suture material and variable anastomotic suture technique in patients undergoing LT with duct-to-duct (DD) anastomosis. METHODS: A retrospective medical record review was conducted of adult patients undergoing LT at a single center between January 1st, 2000 and December 31st, 2023. Suture technique included continuous or interrupted alone, or a combined technique (continuous to posterior wall, interrupted anteriorly), while suture material was either absorbable or non-absorbable suture. Primary endpoint was the incidence of csBAS using a previously introduced surrogate marker, extended biliary dilatation programs (EBDP). Secondary endpoints included time to csBAS, incidence of bile leak, intervention rates with csBAS, and graft failure. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify independent associations with csBAS. Graft survival with csBAS was assessed using a Kaplan-Meier curve. RESULTS: A total of 842 patients underwent 864 LTs with DD anastomosis, of which 123 LTs (14.2%) developed csBAS. The mean age and follow up time were 53.3 ± 11.3 years and 7.0 ± 5.0 years, respectively. Year of transplant (p < 0.01), donor age (p = 0.01), suture material (p = 0.05) and suture technique (p = 0.01) were associated with csBAS on univariable analysis. On multivariable analysis, only donor age (adjusted OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.03, p = 0.03) was found to be independently associated, while absorbable suture material, suture technique and year of transplant were not associated. No difference was seen in bile leaks or graft failure with absorbable suture material nor anastomotic technique. No significant association was observed with time to csBAS, nor between csBAS and graft failure. CONCLUSION: Variable suture technique and suture material during DD reconstruction are associated with comparable outcomes following LT.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。