Bronchodilator Response: Utility and implications in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

支气管扩张剂反应:在接受造血干细胞移植的患者中的应用及意义

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bronchodilator response (BDR) assessment is routinely included in pulmonary evaluation before hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), but its prognostic significance remains uncertain. Recent European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society (ERS/ATS) criteria changes complicate interpretation. RESEARCH QUESTION: To examine associations between BDR and clinical outcomes in HCT recipients and compare prognostic utility of traditional versus revised BDR criteria. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In this single-center study of 1,255 adult allogeneic HCT recipients (2005-2021), we assessed BDR using both 2005 criteria (≥12 % and ≥200 mL increase in FEV(1)/FVC) and 2022 criteria (>10 % of predicted increase). Primary outcomes included bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) development, 120-day ICU admission, and survival. RESULTS: Among patients (58 % male, mean age 51.3 ± 13.6 years), positive BDR frequency was low (11.5 % by 2005 criteria, 14.2 % by 2022 criteria), with high concordance (>94 %). BDR did not predict BOS development, with similar pre-transplant FEV(1) responses between patients who later developed BOS and those who did not (5.0 % vs. 4.9 %, p = 0.841). Unadjusted analyses showed pre-transplant BDR positivity using 2005 criteria was associated with increased mortality (HR = 1.45, p = 0.006) and ICU admission (HR = 1.65, p = 0.005), but these associations did not persist after adjusting for baseline FEV(1) (aHR = 1.17, p = 0.275; aHR = 1.09, p = 0.648). INTERPRETATION: BDR testing provides minimal additional prognostic information beyond baseline lung function assessment in HCT recipients and does not predict BOS development. Our findings support that BOS represents a fibroproliferative process distinct from disorders characterized by airway hyperresponsiveness, suggesting bronchodilator testing could be eliminated from standard HCT protocols without compromising risk assessment.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。