Structured assessment of a cadaveric orthopedic surgical training program of small animal surgeons in training: A prospective observational pilot study

对小动物外科医生尸体骨科手术培训项目进行结构化评估:一项前瞻性观察性试点研究

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether structured and supervised cadaveric surgical training improves technical skills in expert and self-assessments and enhances self-perception of surgical trainees. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Seven small animal ECVS residents and surgical interns. METHODS: A cadaveric orthopedic training program, consisting of six supervised training sessions, weekly self-directed training, and one one-to-one training session with direct feedback, was conducted over 3 months. Each participant performed a set of surgical procedures on feline cadavers before and after the training period. The procedures were videotaped and subsequently evaluated by three board-certified surgeons (expert assessment [EA]) and the participants themselves (self-assessment [SA]) using the objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) global rating scale (GRS). OSATS GRS scores were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Cohen's kappa coefficient (Κ). RESULTS: Comparing pre- and post-training assessments, median EA scores increased from 17/35 to 23/35 (p = .001). Median SA scores increased from 17/35 to 25/35 (p = .018). There was slight to substantial inter-assessor agreement (Κ = 0.04-0.65) and poor agreement between SA and EA (Κ = 0). CONCLUSION: Trainee surgeons improved their technical skills in expert and self-assessments. However, the interassessor agreement was strong for only two of the three assessors. Despite limitations, the OSATS GRS enhanced the objectivity of technical surgical skills assessment. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study represents the first step in devising a meaningful training outside the operating room for veterinary surgical residents. The OSATS GRS as an assessment tool warrants further investigation.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。