A scoping review and thematic analysis of policy implications of novel and emerging nicotine and tobacco products regulation

对新型和新兴尼古丁及烟草产品监管政策影响的范围界定综述和主题分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This scoping review aimed to examine policy implications from studies investigating the effectiveness of policies related to novel and emerging nicotine and tobacco products (NENTPs) and to identify commonalities in policy implications for NENTPs through thematic analysis. METHODS: This scoping review involved a comprehensive search across the following four databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL. The latest search was on March 15, 2025. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines were followed. Studies were included if they examined the effectiveness of NENTPs-related policies. After screening titles, abstracts, and full texts, 21 studies were selected and analyzed based on the framework to derive policy implications. RESULTS: Most studies were conducted in high-income countries. Thematic analysis yielded the following two analytical themes: (1) regulatory governance and policy system architecture for NENTPs control, which included three descriptive themes-namely, regulatory spillover control in the national context, evidence-informed policy transition and regulation, government monitoring and compliance assurance; and (2) exposure reduction at the population level and societal regulation of NENTPs use, with four descriptive themes-namely, product attribute restrictions as an initiation control, regulation of access to retail stores and exposure to youth, economic restraint through tax increase, and customized communication for policy education. CONCLUSION: This study highlights that effective legal regulation of NENTPs requires not only regulatory governance and policy systems but also population-level regulatory mechanisms that reinforce the legal foundation. Our findings provide timely, integrated insights for policymakers by examining commonly shared perspectives among policy researchers.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。