Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine the association between immigration status and women's contraceptive practices based on population data from government surveys. METHODS: A secondary data analysis was conducted on the Quebec Population Health Survey (2014-2015), which aimed to represent 98.8% of the population of Quebec aged 15 years and older through stratified sampling and data weighting (response rate of 61%). Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to compare contraceptive practices between immigrant and Canadian-born women. Two dependent variables were considered: (1) women who used contraception vs. no contraceptive method of any kind, and (2) among women who used contraception, those who used methods that required them to access health care (birth control pill, IUD, or tubal ligation) vs. women who used other methods (condom, coitus interruptus, other). RESULTS: The logistic regression results revealed a strong association between immigration status and contraceptive practices, at two levels: (1) immigrant women had lower odds to use contraception than Canadian-born women; and (2) of the women who use contraception, immigrants had lower odds than those born in Canada to use feminine medical contraception. These findings held true for immigrant women regardless of the number of years they have spent in Canada. Women who lived in low-income households or who had not had a medical consultation for more than one year also had lower odds to use feminine medical contraception. CONCLUSION: Barriers in access to contraceptive care interfere with women's reproductive health and autonomy. The lower odds for immigrant women to use contraception, and particularly the most effective methods, suggest that their contraceptive care needs are at least partially unmet or inadequately addressed. This is concerning given that other studies show no differences in fertility intention between immigrant and Canadian-born women, and high rates of abortion for immigrant women.