Systematic Review of Health Literacy and Health Behavior in Adolescents Research

青少年健康素养和健康行为研究的系统评价

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Despite the publication of several systematic reviews on adolescent health literacy, comprehensive evaluations of the relationship between health literacy and health-related behaviors are still limited. This systematic review sought to synthesize and critically appraise the available evidence on associations between health literacy and health behaviors among adolescents. METHODS: A systematic search of three databases (Scopus, PubMed, and PsycINFO) was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Thirty-seven eligible cross-sectional studies were selected for qualitative synthesis. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale adapted for cross-sectional studies. RESULTS: The 37 included studies encompassed 71,558 adolescents (mean age range 11.0-17.0 years) and were conducted primarily in Europe (n = 22), with additional studies from the USA (n = 5), Asia (n = 8), and cross-cultural settings (n = 2). Across studies, 11 HL instruments were used (including two eHealth literacy measures), most commonly the Health Literacy for School-aged Children scale (n = 14). Physical activity (n = 22), nutrition-related indicators (n = 26), and smoking/alcohol/drug outcomes (n = 16) were assessed using heterogeneous operationalisations. Overall, higher HL was more often associated with healthier behavioral profiles, with more consistent patterns for nutrition-related outcomes. Findings for physical activity and substance use were more heterogeneous and, in some cases, varied depending on the HL measurement approach (subjective vs. objective) and the behavioral reference period. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence indicates that higher health literacy in adolescents is generally associated with more favorable health behaviors, particularly regarding nutrition-related indicators. However, study heterogeneity and the predominance of cross-sectional designs limit comparability and causal inference. Future research should prioritize standardized measurement tools and longitudinal designs to clarify directionality and underlying mechanisms.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。