Evaluation of a low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for chronic prostatitis type IIIb/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

低强度脉冲超声治疗慢性前列腺炎IIIb型/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征的疗效评价:一项随机对照试验

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic prostatitis type IIIb/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) poses significant therapeutic challenges. This study aimed to investigate and compare the clinical efficacy and safety of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) versus tamsulosin for treating CP/CPPS. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 65 patients with CP/CPPS were allocated to two groups. Group A (n = 35) received LIPUS treatment twice weekly, while Group B (n = 30) received tamsulosin sustained-release capsules (0.2 mg, once nightly). The treatment duration was four weeks for all patients. Outcomes were assessed using the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) at baseline and 4 weeks post-intervention. RESULTS: After 4 weeks, both groups showed significant improvements in all NIH-CPSI domains (pain, urinary, quality of life), SAS, and IIEF-5 scores compared to baseline (all P < 0.05). Group A demonstrated significantly greater improvement in pain symptoms than Group B (P < 0.05), whereas Group B showed superior improvement in urinary symptoms compared to Group A (P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between the groups for the remaining symptom domains (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both LIPUS and tamsulosin significantly alleviated CP/CPPS-related symptoms with a favorable safety profile. LIPUS was more effective for pain relief, while tamsulosin was superior for urinary symptoms. Combination therapy may represent a promising approach for managing CP/CPPS.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。