Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of microsoft copilot artificial intelligence chatbot and google search in answering patient inquiries about infertility: evaluating readability, understandability, and actionability

微软 Copilot 人工智能聊天机器人与谷歌搜索在回答不孕症患者咨询方面的有效性比较分析:评估可读性、易懂性和可操作性

阅读:1

Abstract

Failure to achieve spontaneous pregnancy within 12 months despite unprotected intercourse is called infertility. The rapid development of digital health data has led more people to search for healthcare-related topics on the Internet. Many infertile individuals and couples use the Internet as their primary source for information on infertility diagnosis and treatment. However, it is important to assess the readability, understandability, and actionability of the information provided by these sources for patients. There is a gap in the literature addressing this aspect. This study aims to compare the readability, understandability, and actionability of responses generated by Microsoft Copilot (MC), an AI chatbot, and Google Search (GS), an internet search engine, for infertility-related queries. Prospectively a Google Trends analysis was conducted to identify the top 20 queries related to infertility in February, 2024. Then these queries were entered into GS and MC in May 2024. Answers from both platforms were recorded for further analysis. Outputs were assessed using automated readability tools, and readability scores were calculated. Understandability and actionability of answers were evaluated using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials (PEMAT-P) tool. GS was found to have significantly higher Automated Readability Index (ARI) and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) scores than MC (p = 0.044), while no significant differences were observed in the Flesch Reading Ease, Gunning Fog Index, Simplified Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), and Coleman-Liau Index scores. Both GS and MC outputs had readability scores above the 8th-grade level, indicating advanced reading levels. According to PEMAT-P, MC outperformed GS in terms of understandability (68.65 ± 11.99 vs. 54.50 ± 15.09, p = 0.001) and actionability (29.85 ± 17.8 vs. 1 ± 4.47, p = 0.000). MC provides more understandable and actionable responses to infertility related queries, that it might have great potential for patient education.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。