Small area geographic variation in girl and boy child marriage in India: a district-level longitudinal analysis, 2016 and 2021

印度童婚(包括女孩和男孩童婚)的小区域地理差异:2016 年和 2021 年的地区级纵向分析

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) target 5.3 aims to 'eliminate all harmful practices, such as child, early, and forced marriage'. India is a signatory to the SDGs and tracks this indicator to measure national progress. Geographic inequity in the change in the district-level prevalence of child marriage over time in India has not been previously explored. METHODS: We used data from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS) in India from 2016 (NFHS-4) and 2021 (NFHS-5). We aligned districts to be consistent over time. We included 720 districts for girls and 716 for boys. We used a four-level logistic regression model to partition the total variation of boy (<21 years) and girl child marriage (<18 years) in each year. We computed a precision-weighted prevalence of girl and boy child marriage, as well as within-district variation, using standard deviation measures. RESULTS: Across districts, the average prevalence of child marriage decreased from 22.65% to 18.89% among girls and from 16.17% to 13.57% among boys. Inequality across districts in the prevalence of girl and boy child marriage decreased between 2016-21, and there was a negative association between district prevalence in 2016 and the change in district prevalence between 2016-21. There was a positive correlation between the difference in prevalence in boy (r = 0.72; P < 0.001) and girl (r = 0 · 60; P < 0.001) child marriage and the change in standard deviation across districts, indicating increasing inequality in the worst-performing districts. CONCLUSIONS: We provide new insight into recent progress and setbacks in eliminating child marriage across India. We found considerable district-level heterogeneity and clustering of poorly performing districts, coupled with increasing local inequality, especially within the worst-performing districts. Intervention and policy may be more effective if informed by local inequality.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。