Comparing the pharmacokinetics of GS-441524 after intravenous and oral administration of remdesivir in New Zealand cats with feline infectious peritonitis

比较新西兰猫感染性腹膜炎患者静脉注射和口服瑞德西韦后GS-441524的药代动力学

阅读:2

Abstract

ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of GS-441524 after intravenous (IV) and oral administration of compounded remdesivir (RDV) at 30 mg/kg, respectively, in cats with clinical feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) and to determine the bioavailability of GS-441524 after oral administration of compounded RDV in this population.MethodsA total of 13 client-owned cats with a clinical diagnosis of FIP were prospectively recruited. To reflect real-world use, RDV (30 mg/kg) was administered via a 20-min IV infusion or orally (rounded up to capsule size). Plasma GS-441524 concentrations were measured at eight time points over 24 h after administration. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by non-compartment analysis followed by bioavailability calculation.ResultsPharmacokinetic analysis of GS-441524 after administration of oral RDV achieved a mean (±SD) C(max) of 1083.36 ± 634.19 ng/ml (coefficient of variation [CV] 59%, range 254.18-1834.73) at a mean time of 5.33 ± 3.93 h (range 2-12) with a mean elimination t(1/2) of 11.4 ± 8.00 h (range 4.58-27.01). In contrast, IV RDV administration produced a higher mean GS-441524 C(max) of 6262.54 ± 1118.01 ng/ml (CV 18%, range 5193.40-8134.39) at a mean T(max) 0.67 ± 0.26 h (range 0.5-1) with a mean elimination t(1/2) of 6.8 ± 5.55 h (range 3.18-17.85). The mean relative bioavailability of GS-441524 after oral RDV was 30.13%. Bioavailability (range 12-52%) and time to maximum plasma concentrations (2-12 h) were highly variable.Conclusions and relevanceThe oral bioavailability of the compounded RDV used in this study is low, highly variable and appeared lower in cats with effusive disease, although this difference was not statistically significant. Given the small non-randomised sample, results should be interpreted considering the study limitations. Despite the low bioavailability, survival rates in cats treated with oral RDV are comparable to published outcome studies with injectable RDV and oral GS-441524, indicating that oral RDV is a viable treatment option when GS-441524 is not available.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。