Conclusion
Patients with aIgG4-RD can be divided into 3 subgroups based on B cell heterogeneity. The B cell immunophenotyping could help elucidate the pathogenesis of IgG4-RD, identify patients with potential refractory IgG4-RD, and provide important information for the development of new therapies.
Methods
Immunophenotyping of 4 B-cell subsets in peripheral blood from patients with active IgG4-RD (aIgG4-RD, n=105) was performed using flow cytometry to get preliminary B-cell heterogeneity spectrum. Then 10 B-cell subsets were characterized in aIgG4-RD (n = 49), remissive IgG4-RD (rIgG4-RD, n = 49), and healthy controls (HCs, n = 47), followed by principal components analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis to distinguish B-cell immunophenotypes and classify IgG4-RD patients into subgroups.
Results
Cluster analysis identified two endotypes in 105 aIgG4-RD patients based on 4 B-cell subsets: Group1 with higher Breg and naive B cells (n = 48), and Group2 with higher plasmablasts and memory B cells (MBCs) (n = 57). PCA indicated that aIgG4-RD consisted of plasmablast-naive B cell and MBCs-Breg axes abnormalities. There was a negative relationship between naive B cells and disease activity. Both plasmablasts and MBCs were positively associated with serological biomarkers. Cluster analysis stratified aIgG4-RD patients into 3 subgroups based on 10 B-cell subsets: subgroup1 with low MBCs and normal Breg, subgroup2 with high MBCs and low Breg, and subgroup3 with high plasmablasts and low naive B cells. Patients in subroup2 and subgroup3 were more likely to be resistant to treatment.