Comparative investigation into the immune efficiency of the single intradermal and intramuscular delivery of foot-and-mouth disease inactivated vaccine in swine

对猪单次皮内注射和肌肉注射口蹄疫灭活疫苗的免疫效率进行比较研究

阅读:2

Abstract

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is a highly contagious and economically devastating disease. Traditional intramuscular (IM) injection of inactivated FMD vaccines has been crucial for disease control, but intradermal (ID) immunization offers advantages such as reduced vaccine dosage and decreased animal discomfort. The differences in immune efficiency of intradermal and intramuscular delivery of FMD commercial inactivated vaccine in pigs remain unclear. Here, we compared the immune efficacy of ID and IM immunization using the same dose of commercial FMD vaccine. Experimental pigs were administered the vaccine via either ID or IM routes. At 28 days post-immunization (dpi), the ID group produces less uniform levels of FMDV-specific antibodies than IM groups. The detection of IL-4, IL-6, and IFN-γ in porcine serum samples revealed a lower cellular immune response in the ID group as well in the early stages. Meanwhile, the IM group exhibited higher percentages of CD8(+)T cells producing IFN-γ. These results indicate that, at the same dose of FMDV antigen emulsified with adjuvant ISA 201VG, initial humoral and cellular immune responses were weaker in the ID group compared to the IM group in the early stages, and the uniformity of antibody response levels was poorer in the ID group. While ID immunization holds promise for future vaccine strategies, its application with the current inactivated FMDV vaccine carries a higher risk of immunization failure due to the heterogeneity of immune responses.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。