Interprofessional homebased reablement intervention for older adults in Sweden: a randomized controlled trial

瑞典老年人居家康复干预的跨专业合作:一项随机对照试验

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reablement has a health promotive perspective. The goal is to enhance or maintain health and functional ability and, thereby, the ability of older adults to live in their own homes. The intervention described in this study was introduced so the older person would remain at home and be given the opportunity to regain or maintain functional ability physically, mentally, and socially to live independently and have optimal health and well-being. This paper aims to report the measured effects of reablement among the older adults in terms of bio-psycho-social health that emerged in the randomized controlled trial (RCT). METHODS: A sample of older adults (65+) was studied, consisting of those who applied for homecare in the municipal home service (n = 237), those who received intensive home reablement (IHR) carried out by an interprofessional team, and a control group who received home-based care as usual. Data were collected at three different occasions with validated instruments: at inclusion, after completion of IHR, and 3 months after completed intervention. RESULTS: Both groups improved significantly at the post-measurement, and this improvement was maintained at the 3-month follow-up regarding: global quality of life (HACT); general health (EQ-5D-5 L); the self-estimates for mobility, hygiene, daily activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression (EQ-5D-5 L); subjective well-being (GP-CORE); self-assessed capacity to perform physical activities as well as satisfaction with performance (COPM); measures of physical activity capacity regarding lower extremities (SPPB); upper extremities (hand dynamometer test). No between group differences were statistically significant. At the 3-month follow-up, the average number of homecare hours was slightly lower in the group that underwent IHR than in the group receiving usual homecare and rehabilitation interventions, but the difference was not statistically certain. CONCLUSIONS: In this RCT with a relatively short follow-up period, IHR was equivalent to traditional homecare regarding older people's self-reported health, physical activity ability and number of homecare hours. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03565614?intr=Reablement&rank=4) Registration number: NCT03565614. Registered on 1 January 2016.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。