Highly Reproducible, Vendor-Agnostic, Motion-Insensitive Liver PDFF Mapping at 0.55T, 1.5T, and 3T

在 0.55T、1.5T 和 3T 磁场强度下,实现了高度可重复、与厂商无关、运动不敏感的肝脏 PDFF 映射。

阅读:2

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop and validate a vendor-agnostic, motion-insensitive proton-density fat-fraction (PDFF) quantification method. METHODS: Flip-angle-modulated (FAM) 2D chemical-shift-encoded (CSE) MRI for PDFF quantification was implemented in both the vendor-agnostic platform Pulseq ("Pulseq-FAM") and one vendor-specific platform ("GE-specific FAM"). These implementations were distributed to four sites with twelve MR systems of three vendors (Siemens/GE/Philips) and field strengths (0.55T/1.5T/3T). A sequentially-shipped 16-vial phantom (PDFF = 0%-30%/T1(water) = 200-1400 ms) underwent confounder-corrected PDFF mapping with commercial 3D-CSE methods and GE-specific FAM as available on each system, and Pulseq-FAM on every system. To assess bias, phantom PDFF measurements were compared to reference. Between-system variance was evaluated with linear mixed-effects modeling. Different volunteers were also imaged at each site to assess free-breathing PDFF mapping feasibility. A prospective single-site volunteer study was also conducted. Adult patients and children were imaged with breath-held 3D-CSE and free-breathing GE-specific and Pulseq-FAM. Radiologists evaluated images for overall quality and motion artifacts. To assess bias, Pulseq-FAM PDFF measurements were compared to 3D-CSE and GE-specific FAM. Test-retest repeatability was assessed by re-imaging after repositioning. Between-field-strength reproducibility was assessed at 1.5T and 3.0T. RESULTS: In the multi-center study, Pulseq-FAM showed reduced T1-bias and between-system variability versus 3D-CSE in phantom PDFF measurements, and free-breathing feasibility in volunteers. In the single-site volunteer study (N = 57), Pulseq-FAM improved image quality and motion artifacts versus 3D-CSE (p < 0.01). Pulseq-FAM showed excellent agreement with 3D-CSE (95% limits-of-agreement (LoA) = 3.4% PDFF) and GE-specific FAM (LoA = 2.0%). Pulseq-FAM showed excellent repeatability (repeatability coefficient (RC) = 1.6% PDFF) and between-field-strength reproducibility (reproducibility coefficient (RDC) = 2.4%) versus 3D-CSE (RC = 2.7%/RDC = 3.4%; differences p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Pulseq-FAM enables accurate, reproducible, vendor-agnostic, and motion-insensitive PDFF quantification in adults and children.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。