Comparative Outcomes of Neo-Adjuvant Chemo-Radiotherapy in Stage II and III Mucinous versus Non-Mucinous Rectal Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Study

黏液性与非黏液性直肠腺癌II期和III期新辅助放化疗疗效比较:一项回顾性研究

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study investigates the effectiveness of neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (neo-CRT) in patients with clinical stage II and III mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma (MRA) and compares clinical outcomes with those of non-mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma (NMRA). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients diagnosed with clinical stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma, confirmed via pelvic imaging, who underwent curative surgical procedures from January 2009 to December 2023. Exclusion criteria encompassed stage I and IV cases, those treated as emergencies, and patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Patients were classified into neo-adjuvant treatment groups and compared based on tumor type (MRA vs NMRA) using statistical analyses. RESULTS: Of 550 cases, 359 met inclusion. Most patients were young adults (58% aged 20-30), reflecting unusually early onset in Yemen. Neo-CRT was administered to 180 patients (93 MRA, 87 NMRA), while 179 (87 MRA, 92 NMRA) did not receive it. NMRA tumors were 3.24× more likely to downstage than MRA (P = 0.0007; OR = 3.235). After CRT, yp Stage II occurred in 40.23% of NMRA (95% CI: 30.68-50.68%) versus 17% of MRA (95% CI: 10.99-26.15%), while yp Stage III persisted in 60% versus 82.80% respectively (P = 0.0003). Pathological complete response (pCR) was seen in 11% of NMRA but <2% of MRA. Survival analysis showed MRA as the strongest adverse factor (CSS HR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.39-3.09, P = 0.0002; OS HR = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.25-2.57, P = 0.0013), with advanced stage also predictive of poorer outcomes (CSS HR = 1.65, P = 0.043; OS HR = 1.87, P = 0.006). Neo-CRT itself conferred no survival benefit (CSS HR = 0.98, P = 0.91; OS HR = 1.24, P = 0.24). Disease-free survival (DFS) was lower in MRA (52% vs 72%, P = 0.004) and local recurrence higher (26% vs 5%, P = 0.0004), while Neo-CRT produced no significant survival benefit (15% vs 19%, P = 0.40). CONCLUSION: Both MRA stages II and III showed inferior cancer-free and overall survival outcomes. The justification for neo-adjuvant therapy necessitates a careful evaluation of potential benefits versus risks in MRA patients. The younger age of Yemeni colorectal cancer patients warrants further epidemiological studies to explore genetic and environmental risk factors. It also highlights the urgent need for tailored screening protocols, public health interventions, and awareness campaigns.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。