Comparative Analysis of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Contemporary Treatments for Psoriasis Vulgaris

传统中医药与现代疗法治疗寻常型银屑病的比较分析

阅读:1

Abstract

This scoping review synthesizes existing research comparing traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and contemporary treatments (CTs) for managing psoriasis vulgaris (PsV). A thorough literature search was conducted across multiple databases through February 2024, identifying relevant systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental, and observational studies that contrast TCM approaches with CTs for PsV. From an initial pool, 195 articles were analyzed, indicating a growing interest in this comparative area, with most studies involving sample sizes between 30 and 100 participants. Key interventions included both internal and topical applications of Chinese herbal medicines, notably Rehmanniae Radix, Arnebiae Radix, and Smilacis Glabrae Rhizoma. Outcomes focused on PASI scores, quality of life metrics, and adverse effects. Results suggest that TCM offers efficacy in improving PASI scores and quality of life; however, evidence concerning toxicity profiles, recurrence rates, and comorbidity outcomes remains sparse. Notable research gaps include a lack of comprehensive data on newer treatment modalities, particularly biologics. Future studies should aim to delineate subjects and interventions in greater detail to support clinical applicability.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。