Printed simulation models versus organ models in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass training: a prospective validation study of efficacy, learning curve, and cost-effectiveness

腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术训练中打印模拟模型与器官模型的比较:一项前瞻性验证研究,旨在评估其有效性、学习曲线和成本效益

阅读:3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is a complex bariatric surgical procedure that demands advanced technical skills. However, traditional training models (virtual simulators, cadavers, and porcine organs) are Limited by issues concerning realism, cost, and accessibility. Although 3D-printed models offer promising potential solutions, their application in LRYGB training remains underexplored. METHODS: 3D-printed silicone models of stomach and small intestine were fabricated using patient-derived anatomical data. The physical properties of these models (tensile strength, conductivity, and rheology) were compared with those of human and porcine tissues. Face and content validity , as well as technical realism, were evaluated through expert questionnaires. Construct validity was assessed using the Modified Bariatric Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (MBOSATS). Trainees participated in repeated simulation sessions to evaluate their learning curves. RESULTS: The silicone models demonstrated tensile strengths comparable to those of human tissues. Additionally, they exhibited superior aesthetics compared to porcine models (P < 0.05). Experts highly rated the face and content validity of the models, with median scores ranging from 4 to 5 out of 5. MBOSATS scores effectively differentiated between expertise levels (experts: 188.2 ± 1.48 vs. Intermediates: 145.10 ± 11.45 vs. residents: 64.1 ± 4.19, P < 0.001). In terms of training effectiveness, trainees achieved proficiency after 4-5 sessions, and post-training performance of residents on porcine models matched that of intermediates (P > 0.05). The models cost $2,000, significantly less than cadaver or animal alternatives. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D-printed silicone models exhibit realistic mechanical properties, process high validity, and have proven effective in expediting skill acquisition during LRYGB training. They serve as a cost-effective and ethical alternative to traditional training tools, offering particular advantages in resource-constrained settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was prospectively registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) under registration number ChiCTR2300078726 on 15 December 2023. The trial protocol was approved prior to the enrollment of the first participant, ensuring adherence to ethical standards and transparency in reporting health care intervention outcomes.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。