Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patients with Acute Neck Pain Undergoing Conservative Treatment with Korean Medicine

韩医保守治疗急性颈痛患者的临床疗效差异甚微

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for patients with acute neck pain undergoing conservative treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This secondary data analysis of a randomized controlled trial investigated 128 individuals with acute neck pain receiving conservative treatment. The MCID and SCB of pain, functional disability, and quality of life were assessed using anchor-based methods. Patients' global impression of changes at week 9 was used as the anchor. A receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed, and the Youden index was employed to determine the optimal cut-off point. Area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated to assess accuracy. Minimal detectable changes (MDCs) were estimated using a distribution-based approach. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 60.2% female patients with an average age of 40.7 ± 12.7 years. The visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain during movement at baseline was 64.5 ± 10.6. The outcome measures' estimated MCID values (AUC) were as follows: VAS for pain during movement, -19.9 (0.89) and at rest, -17.5 (0.83); Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire score, -14.7 (0.78); neck disability index, -10.6 (0.77); and physical component summary (PCS), 2.0 (0.83). The SCB estimates indicated thresholds of outcome improvement to be 1.5-3-fold higher. The MDC for PCS (9.49) exceeded its MCID and SCB. CONCLUSION: This study provides estimates for multidimensional MCID and SCB in acute neck pain treated conservatively. These values may assist clinicians in interpreting outcomes and setting meaningful treatment goals in clinical practice.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。