The clinical efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)治疗急性心肌梗死患者的临床疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析

阅读:2

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF), but the evidence of their efficacy in patients who have had an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is still incompletely established. This review aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular and structural outcomes in patients who had a recent AMI, irrespective of HF. METHODS: We searched various electronic databases, including MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov, till February 2025 to retrieve randomized controlled trials comparing SGLT2 inhibitors to placebo in patients with AMI. We performed a statistical analysis on RevMan 5.4 using the random effect model. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis included seven RCTs involving 11 302 patients compared SGLT2 inhibitors to placebo in patients with AMI. SGLT2 inhibitors significantly decreased the rate of hospitalization for HF (RR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.61-0.88) with no significant change in mortality (RR 1.05, 95% CI: 0.78-1.40), all-cause hospitalization (RR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.84-1.17), and cardiovascular death (RR 1.03, 95% CI: 0.83-1.28). The incidence of hepatic injury, ketoacidosis, hypoglycemia, or lower limb amputation remained comparable across the two groups. SGLT2 inhibitors did not cause a significant reduction in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP) from baseline (MD -0.28 95%, CI: -0.61-0.05) nor improved the left ventricular ejection fraction at follow-up (MD 0.62, 95%, CI -0.73-1.97) compared to the placebo. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, while SGLT2 inhibitors show promise in reducing hospitalization for HF post-AMI, their impact on mortality and safety outcomes necessitates further investigation. This underscores the need for larger, more diverse RCTs to fully illustrate their role and timing of initiation in AMI management. An individualized approach based on risk assessment should guide their use in the post-AMI population.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。