Language Barriers and Access to Hospital Patient Portals in the US

美国医院患者门户网站的语言障碍及访问问题

阅读:1

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Although patient portals are becoming important tools in health care delivery, there is a lack of published data on the language accessibility of these digital platforms. OBJECTIVE: To examine the language accessibility of hospitals' patient portals. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study identified 51 counties in the 17 US states (5 western states, 2 midwestern, 4 northeastern, and 6 southern) with at least 300 000 residents with limited English proficiency. From eligible hospitals with public-facing patient portal platforms, the following data were obtained between September and December 2024: the URL (uniform resource locator) and language accessibility of the patient portal (ie, of the login prompts), portal vendor, and whether the availability of secure portal messaging was explicitly described. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was language accessibility of the portal login page (binary variable: only English vs in at least 2 languages). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with accessibility of the portal login page in at least 2 languages. RESULTS: Among 514 eligible hospitals (194 [38.0%] in West census region), 511 (99.4%) had public-facing patient portal platforms and were thus included in the analytic cohort; 429 (84.0%) were nonteaching hospitals. Patient portals were accessible in only English at 150 hospitals (29.4%); in English and Spanish only at 305 hospitals (59.7%); and in English, Spanish, and at least 1 additional language at 56 hospitals (10.9%). Only 24 of the 511 hospitals (4.7%) offered portal access in the most common non-English, non-Spanish language of their respective counties. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, teaching hospitals had higher odds of offering portals with multilingual accessibility (odds ratio [OR], 2.21; 95% CI, 1.66-2.95) compared with nonteaching hospitals, while hospitals that used vendors other than Epic MyChart or Cerner had lower odds (OR 0.34; 95% CI, 0.24-0.48 vs Epic). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cross-sectional study of hospitals in 17 states, only a small proportion offered patient portals that were accessible in a non-English, non-Spanish language. As digital health care continues to evolve, prioritizing language accessibility in its design is essential to ensure inclusivity for all patients.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。