Intertypic Recombination Between Coxsackievirus A16 and Enterovirus A71 Structural and Non-Structural Genes Modulates Virulence and Protection Efficacy

柯萨奇病毒A16和肠道病毒A71结构基因和非结构基因之间的型间重组调节毒力和保护效力

阅读:2

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Enterovirus A71 (EV-A71) and coxsackievirus A16 (CVA16) are major causative agents of hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD), often co-circulating and occasionally undergoing genetic recombination. While natural recombinants often involve genomic regions encoding non-structural proteins, their effects on replication and pathogenesis remain unclear. Methods: To address this, four chimera viruses (Chi-CCE, Chi-ECE, Chi-EEC, and Chi-CEC) were constructed with 5'UTR, capsid P1, and non-structural P2 and P3 genes, from CVA16 (denoted as C) or EV-A71 (denoted as E). These chimeras were tested for replication kinetics and cytopathic effects in rhabdomyosarcoma cells while in vivo virulence and protection efficacy were evaluated using a newborn BALB/c mouse model. Results: All chimeric viruses remained viable and exhibited higher replication than CVA16. In vivo, all chimeric viruses were avirulent except Chi-CCE and CVA16, which showed high virulence and viral titres in the brains and limbs of infected newborn mice. This suggests that 5'UTR and capsid P1 genes of CVA16 are critical genetic determinants of virulence. Notably, only the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 was elevated, suggesting potential immune modulation during infection. Inactivated Chi-CCE immunisation conferred 100% protection against lethal CVA16 or mouse-adapted EV-A71 challenge revealing its potential as a bivalent vaccine candidate. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that recombination between CVA16 and EV-A71 influences viral virulence and protection efficacy with implications for future development of multivalent vaccines.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。