Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant FLOT treatment for resectable gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma in Turkish and German patients; a real-world data

新辅助FLOT方案治疗土耳其和德国可切除胃/胃食管交界处腺癌患者的疗效和安全性:一项真实世界研究

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Perioperative FLOT is the current standard of treatment in resectable gastric adenocarcinoma(GC) and adenocarcinoma of gastroesophageal junction(GEJC). However, many ethnicities remain underrepresented in clinical trials or are not differentiated in subgroup analyses, making it unclear whether outcomes, especially major pathological response (mPR), vary across different populations. METHODS: Turkish(Tp) and German(Gp) patients with resectable GC/GEJC who received perioperative FLOT were evaluated retrospectively. The primary endpoint was mPR which was defined as pathological complete response or near-complete response. The secondary endpoints were disease-free survival(DFS), overall survival(OS), and safety. RESULTS: Forty-seven Tp and 55 Gp were included. While Tp had more GC(63.8% vs. 36.2%), GEJC was higher in Gp(41.8% vs. 58.2%)(p = 0.027). Tp had more node-positive diseases(91.5% vs. 63.6%, p = 0.005), and received more cycles of neoadjuvant FLOT(p < 0.001). The most commonly seen side effects were anemia in Tp, and neutropenia and neuropathy in Gp. R0 resection ratio was 87.2% in Tp and 92.7% in Gp. The ratio of mPR was higher in Gp (36% vs. 18.5%, p = 0.04) While German ethnicity and clinical node negativity was associated with better mPR in the univariate analysis, only clinical node negativity was associated with better mPR in the multivariate analysis [OR:3.951, 95% CI (1.168-13.365), p = 0.027]. There was no relation between mPR and other clinical factors including tumor location, histology and intensified neoadjuvant treatment (> 4 cycles of FLOT). Gp had longer DFS(53.22 vs. 21.42 months, p = 0.03) and OS(57.99 vs. 29.37 months, p = 0.05). However, mPR did not show any association with OS and DFS. Turkish ethnicity was related with worse OS and DFS in univariate analysis but not multivariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that intensified neoadjuvant treatment(> 4 cycles), signet-cell carcinoma, and higher pathological N-stage were independent risk factors for decreased OS. After adjusting for clinical node positivity and tumor location; intensified neoadjuvant treatment(> 4 cycles), and higher pathological N stage remained associated with worse OS. DISCUSSION: This bicentric study reveals that although ethnicity had limited prognostic impact, lymph node status remained the strongest determinant of outcome in perioperatively treated patients with GC/GEJC. Intensified treatment did not improve mPR and was associated with worse OS, while mPR itself was not independently linked to OS. Pathological nodal positivity and signet-ring cell carcinoma were the key predictors of poor survival. These findings highlight the importance of nodal risk stratification and tailored follow-up over therapy intensification.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。