Best practices for home nutritional management in postoperative gastric cancer patients: an evidence summary

胃癌术后患者居家营养管理最佳实践:证据总结

阅读:3

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review and summarize the most compelling evidence on home nutritional management for postoperative gastric cancer patients, with the aim of providing a reference to improve patients' nutritional status at home. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted across both Chinese and English-language databases according to the '6S' evidence resource model to identify relevant literature on home nutritional management for postoperative gastric cancer patients. The selected studies were screened, evaluated, and synthesized to extract high-quality evidence. RESULTS: A total of 19 articles were included in the final review, including 6 evidence-based guidelines, 4 expert consensus, 2 systematic reviews, 1 evidence summary, 1 qualitative study, 1 class experiment, and 4 RCTs. Through induction and integration, 27 best evidences were formed, which was cat-egorized into seven key areas: nutritional monitoring and assessment, multidisciplinary teamwork, home nutritional management, home nutritional support, health promotion, symptom management, and post-discharge follow-up. These evidences provide clear practical recommendations, such as the selection of home nutrition assessment tools (NRS-2002), the frequency of nutrition assessment (Every two weeks for the first three months), the order of home nutrition during rehabilitation (Diet-ONS-HEN), and the treatment of postoperative adverse nutritional symptoms. CONCLUSION: This study presents a systematic compilation of the best available evidence on home nutritional management for postoperative gastric cancer patients. The findings provide a scientifically grounded framework for healthcare professionals and patients to optimize nutritional care at home. In the future, investigations should focus on translating these evidences into practice through implementation science methodologies, while systematically evaluating the contextual barriers of the implementation of theoretical evidence and the gap between it and the real demand.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。