Comparing the biopsy strategies of prostate cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

前列腺癌活检策略比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析

阅读:2

Abstract

The introduction of three kinds of magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsies (MRI-PB) has changed the paradigm regarding prostate biopsies (PB). We aimed to compare and rank PB strategies to provide the latest evidence of PB option for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis. We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library Central, Scopus, Embase and the reference lists of relevant articles for randomized controlled trials published up to Dec, 2024, of different PB strategies. Finally, 24 randomized trials were included. Eleven PB strategies published were considered. For overall PCa detection rates exclusively previously negative biopsy patients, we found robust improvements of 3.92 (95% CI: 2.17-6.41) for MRI-cognitive- and 1.78 (95% CI: 1.02-3.07) for MRI/TRUS- compared to TRUS(10-12)-PB. For PCa detection when prostate volume ≤ 50 mm(3), only MRI/TRUS- was significantly effective than TRUS(10-12)-PB (OR 1.78, 95% CI: 1.0-2.89). Our study indicated that MRI-cognitive-PB was associated with better overall PCa detection rates compared with TRUS(10-12)-PB, but it had no remarkable advantages in csPCa and ciPCa detection. More head-to-head comparisons of MRI-PB techniques are needed in the future.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。