Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study was designed to compare the diagnostic efficacy of mSEPT9 to four blood markers (CEA, CA19-9, platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)). In addition, we aimed to determine the combined diagnostic efficacy of mSEPT9, CEA, CA19-9, PLR and NLR in colorectal cancer. METHODS: A total of 567 participants were enrolled in the study, including 308 CRC patients, 61 colorectal polyp patients and 198 healthy subjects confirmed by colonoscopy and/or tissue biopsy. Plasma samples were collected for tests. RESULTS: The positive rate of mSEPT9 in CRC (71.8%) was markedly higher than that in either the colorectal polyps group (27.9%) or the healthy controls (6.1%) (P < 0.001). The levels of CEA, CA19-9, NLR and PLR in the CRC group were significantly higher than those in the non-CRC groups (P < 0.05). ROC curves comparison analyses showed that the diagnostic efficacy of mSEPT9 alone in CRC was significantly higher than CEA, CA19-9, NLR and PLR alone. The combination of mSEPT9 with CEA, CA19-9 and PLR showed superior diagnostic value. In addition, binary logistic regression was also used to build a better model for clinical diagnosis of CRC. On univariable analyses, age, mSEPT9, CEA, CA 19-9, PLR and NLR were independent predictors of CRC. When these covariates were fitted in multivariable models, the ones with positive detection of mSEPT9, CEA, CA 19-9 and PLR were more likely to have CRC. CONCLUSIONS: This research revealed a significant association between mSEPT9 status and the clinicopathological characteristics of CRC patients, and the combination of mSEPT9, CEA, CA19-9 and PLR could significantly improve diagnostic efficacy in CRC.