Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) versus teniposide (TEN) in patients with newly diagnosed immunocompetent primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs). METHODS: The study included immunocompetent, adult patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL at 22 centers in China from 2007 to 2016. The patients received HD-MTX or TEN as first-line induction therapy. The objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival were analyzed for each patient cohort. RESULTS: A total of 96 patients were eligible: 62 received HD-MTX, while 34 received teniposide. The overall response rate was 73.2% and 72.7% in the MTX and the TEN cohorts, respectively (P = 0.627). The median progression-free survival was 28.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 13.7-51.2] in the MTX cohort and 24.3 months (95% CI: 16.6-32.1) in the TEN cohort (P = 0.75). The median overall survival was 31 months (95% CI: 26.8-35.2) in the MTX cohort and 32 months (95% CI: 27.6-36.4) in the TEN cohort (P = 0.77). The incidence of any grade of coagulopathy/deep-vein thrombosis and gastrointestinal disorders was significantly higher in the MTX cohort than in the TEN cohort; no significant difference was found in the incidence of other adverse events between the two cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: This was the first multicenter study using TEN as the main agent compared with HD-MTX in newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma. The TEN-based regimen was non-inferior to the HD-MTX-based regimen with similar overall responses. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provided Class III evidence that the teniposide-based regimen was non-inferior to high-dose methotrexate - based regimen with similar overall responses and long-time survival in immunocompetent patients with PCNSL.