R-DA-EPOCH Versus DA-EPOCH-R: Impact of Chemoimmunotherapy Sequencing on Treatment Outcomes in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

R-DA-EPOCH方案与DA-EPOCH-R方案:化疗免疫疗法顺序对弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者治疗结果的影响

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chemoimmunotherapy with rituximab (R) added to dose-adjusted (DA)-EPOCH (continuous infusion of etoposide, vincristine, and doxorubicin with cyclophosphamide and prednisone) has become a standard treatment approach for high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. In contrast to pivotal trials that sequenced rituximab with the initiation of each chemoimmunotherapy cycle, our institution adopted delaying rituximab following discharge after EPOCH completion in patients requiring inpatient chemotherapy (DA-EPOCH-R). Herein, we evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab sequencing with EPOCH initiation and after EPOCH administration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all DLBCL patients who received first-line treatment with R-DA-EPOCH or DA-EPOCH-R between 2016 and 2023 was conducted. Outcomes of interest included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR), overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of relapse. RESULTS: A total of 31 DA-EPOCH-R and 35 R-DA-EPOCH patients were included. PFS at 4-years was not significantly different between DA-EPOCH-R and R-DA-EPOCH treated patients (75.2% vs. 77.9%; HR 1.10; 95% CI, 0.38-3.13; P = .86). ORR (93.5% vs. 100%; P = .22) and CR (90.3% vs. 85.7%; P = .71) were also similar between cohorts. Rituximab-related infusion reactions were higher among R-DA-EPOCH-treated patients with cycle 1 (P = .038). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest delaying rituximab following EPOCH did not affect treatment outcomes and are associated with lower infusion reactions.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。