Engineering Compact Base Editors by AlphaFold-Guided Mutation Scan and Escherichia coli-Based Tri-Selection

利用 AlphaFold 引导的突变扫描和基于大肠杆菌的三选择技术构建紧凑型碱基编辑器

阅读:2

Abstract

APOBEC1-based cytosine base editors such as BE4max enable base conversion, but many alternative deaminases show low activity and cytotoxicity, especially when miniaturized for delivery. SsdA(tox), a DNA deaminase toxin from Pseudomonas syringae that is two-thirds the size of APOBEC1, is attractive for compact base editors but, in native form, shows low C-to-T editing efficiency and high cytotoxicity. Guided by an AlphaFold- and CASTpFold-based alanine scan, we identified K31 as a gatekeeping residue whose substitution enlarges the modeled DNA binding pocket. Site-saturation mutagenesis at K31 produced variants with ten-fold higher activity but increased indel formation. To further enhance activity while reducing indels and cytotoxicity, we developed Trinity-Screen, an Escherichia coli (E. coli)-based three-in-one directed evolution platform that selects for high activity and reduced double-strand break-associated indels. Trinity-Screen revealed four additional DNA-binding positions; combinatorial mutagenesis at these sites generated four- and five-site SsdA(tox) variants that retained high activity yet showed lower indel rates and rescued bacterial viability. To standardize comparisons, we defined the Base Editor Performance Index (BEPI), which integrates C-to-T conversion and indel frequency. Optimized SsdA(tox) variants achieved up to 31-fold improvement relative to wild type, outperforming BE4max at multiple endogenous targets and displaying ten-fold lower cytotoxicity in E. coli.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。