Developing emergency care systems in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review to examine the role of leadership and governance

在低收入和中等收入国家发展紧急医疗服务体系:一项旨在探讨领导力和治理作用的范围界定审查

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: More knowledge and resources are required to strengthen 'leadership and governance' (L+G) as a central building block to further develop emergency care (EC) systems in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). OBJECTIVES: This scoping review aimed to examine and map the impact of individual, collective or institutional L+G on the development of EC systems (prehospital and facility-based) in LMICs. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: English language publications from January 2005 to April 2024 that linked any L+G action with the development and capacity of everyday EC in LMICs, specifically excluding disaster responses. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE: Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL, Web of Science (Clarivate), Central (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), Global Health (Ovid) and select grey literature. CHARTING METHODS: Data from all eligible papers were jointly extracted using a piloted tool developed from the literature and WHO's EC Systems Framework. L+G descriptors included level (from clinical to national) and components (informed by Siddiqi et al's LMIC health system 'good governance' framework and a synthesis of EC policy documents). Impact of L+G on EC systems and key lessons were extracted from each publication. RESULTS: From an initial 9713 items, 129 papers were included for final analysis and divided by EC component: prehospital (n=35), facility-based (n=53) and 'whole of EC system' (n=41). Qualitative and descriptive papers were most common, and 72 out of a possible 131 LMICs were represented. Findings were heterogeneous across all building blocks of EC systems and for different components of leadership and/or governance. Cross-cutting L+G themes were identified that demonstrated consistent impact across all EC systems development: government recognition, vision and human rights framing; coalition-building for effective partnerships and trained, empowered EC clinicians demonstrating emotionally intelligent, transformational leadership. CONCLUSIONS: Applying new models such as Theories of Change and Social Network Analysis concepts may assist to illuminate how effective L+G is attained, what are the essential components and how these influence EC systems for better patient-centred outcomes. Further understanding the role of L+G for EC systems has utility for future EC clinician leadership training and policy-maker awareness, to strengthen resilience of overall health systems against likely future shocks.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。