Regional variation in clinical-trial risks: a large-scale analysis of 585 clinical trials

临床试验风险的区域差异:一项对 585 项临床试验的大规模分析

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess 10 common indicators of clinical trial risks across regions. DESIGN: Retrospective pooled analysis of routine central-monitoring outputs. DATA SOURCES: Data came from a central-monitoring platform (2015-2025), which contains data from clinical trials conducted worldwide by 46 different sponsors and contract research organisations acting on behalf of sponsors. Trial sites were grouped into seven geographic regions-North America, Central/South America, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, Africa/Middle East, Asia, Pacific-to assess regional differences in monitored clinical-trial risks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome-Relative Key Risk Indicator (KRI) risk score, defined as the relative risk in the selected region in comparison to the expected risk computed using data across all regions globally for 10 common risks usually assessed in clinical trials. RESULTS: A total of 585 studies involving 56 189 sites comprising data from all regions of the world were used in the analysis. No obvious concerns were identified regarding the conduct of reliable clinical research in any region. However, for some KRIs (eg, off-schedule visit rate, protocol deviation rate and screen failure rate), there was substantial variability observed of relative risks across regions. Conversely, some other KRIs (eg, visit-to-entry cycle time and adverse event reporting rate) had a very narrow distribution across all regions. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight regional differences across some common risks that may help clinical trials sponsors to plan future trials and take prospective measures to reduce KRI-related risks in some regions of the world.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。