Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A multidisciplinary team is essential to providing high-quality, patient-centred care. However, its effectiveness can be either hindered or facilitated by various factors, such as the need for rapid decision-making, which may compromise patient outcomes despite individual efforts. The aim of this study is to synthesise the factors that may act as barriers and facilitators to the work of multidisciplinary teams in managing labour within acute care settings. DESIGN: A systematic qualitative review and meta-synthesis was conducted following the five-step methodology proposed by Sandelowski et al. DATA SOURCE: Three databases (Medline, Embase and Scopus) were systematically searched without time restrictions up to 25 May 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Qualitative studies exploring perspectives, experiences and other similar factors were included. These studies were assessed for methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: The reviewers independently searched, screened and coded the results of the included studies. Data were synthesised using the method proposed by Thomas and Harden. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were included in the meta-synthesis. Four key dimensions emerged, reflecting both the barriers and the facilitators of multidisciplinary team performances: (1) organisational variables, (2) individual variables, (3) collaborative variables and (4) role variables. A total of 36 variables were identified, which could function as barriers (n=6; eg, high staff turnover), facilitators (n=6; eg, strong listening skills) or both (n=24; eg, team climate), depending on the context. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-synthesis identifies specific barriers and facilitators and variables that can act as both. Understanding these factors enables targeted interventions to enhance the performance of multidisciplinary teams in clinical practice, particularly in acute care settings. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022297395.