Analysis of the possible pathways between social and well-being outcomes: a mixed-method study about community-based sociotherapy for refugees in Nakivale Settlement, Uganda

对社会结果与福祉结果之间可能路径的分析:一项关于乌干达纳基瓦莱难民安置点社区社会治疗的混合方法研究

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Refugees in Nakivale Settlement, southwestern Uganda, are at risk of suffering from both mental health and social problems due to migration-related stressors. Mental health and psychosocial support is offered to improve their well-being. The theories of change of mental health and psychosocial support interventions often assume that individual and social outcomes are interrelated. By analysing changes in well-being and social support after Community-Based Sociotherapy (CBS), we assess the pathways between these outcomes. METHODS: This study uses a longitudinal mixed-method approach, analysing survey data from 98 CBS participants at three time points, and 11 focus group discussions. We focus on well-being and social support outcomes. We first analysed the quantitative data (paired t-tests, correlations, random-intercept cross-lagged panel model), followed by a qualitative content analysis to interpret the quantitative findings. RESULTS: We did not find quantitative evidence of within-person influence processes between well-being and social support, and the significantly positive changes in these outcomes between the pre- and posttest declined over time. The qualitative data shed new light on the changes in the lives of the participants after participating in CBS, and the barriers to and facilitators of change. CONCLUSIONS: Among this group of participants, we found no quantitative and limited qualitative evidence that improvements in well-being led to improved social outcomes, or vice versa. We consider how methodological limitations (i.e. our sample size and limited number of survey items) may have influenced our results, and contextual and temporal explanations for the lack of evidence of pathways. This finding stands in contrast with the theories of change of many mental health and psychosocial support interventions, and therefore calls for consideration of the complex realities of people living in refugee settings, rather than assuming simple pathways.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。