Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the clinical performance of Medisonic (Daiwha Corp.) to that of Harmonic HD 1000i (Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc.) and Sonicision (Medtronic) in patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer. METHODS: A total of 30 patients were enrolled in this prospective randomized study. The patients were randomly assigned to a Medisonic (M group, n = 10), Harmonic HD 1000i (H group, n = 10), or Sonicision (S group, n = 10) groups. Primary outcome was cutting speed and activation times during omentectomy. Other variables were visibility of surgical field, blade stickiness, and clinical outcomes, including operation-related complications. RESULTS: Clinicopathologic characteristics, including age, sex, body mass index, or stage were not different between the 3 groups. Operative outcomes, including operation time, estimated blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay were not different between the 3 groups. There was no significant difference in 30-day postoperative complications. The running time of omentectomy was 7.3, 9.2, and 8.7 minutes in the H, S, and M groups, respectively, with no statistical difference (P = 0.589). We also looked at the activation times during the omentectomy, and there was no statistical difference between the groups (52.6 times vs. 58.9 times vs. 56.2 times in the H, S, and M groups, respectively; P = 0.860). CONCLUSION: Medisonic is safe and efficient to perform laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and is not inferior to Harmonic HD 1000i or Sonicision in terms of clinical outcomes and cutting/sealing function.