Volume-targeted versus pressure-limited ventilation for preterm infants

早产儿容量目标通气与压力限制通气的比较

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare the effects of volume-targeted ventilation (VTV) with pressure-limited ventilation (PLV) in preterm infants. METHODS: A total of 100 preterm infants who required mechanical ventilation during the two study periods were investigated. PLV was used for 50 preterm infants during period 1 and VTV was used for 50 preterm infants during period 2. Clinical outcomes including mortality rate, duration of mechanical ventilation, air leak syndrome, hypocarbia, hypercarbia, hypoxemia, combined outcome of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), intraventricular hemorrhage, and retinopathy of prematurity were evaluated. RESULTS: There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in the duration of mechanical ventilation, air leak syndrome, hypocarbia, hypoxemia, or BPD between the two study groups. The mortality rate, hypercarbia, and combined outcome of death or BPD were significantly lower (p < 0.05) in the VTV group compared with the PLV group. CONCLUSION: Preterm infants using VTV had a lower mortality rate, less hypercarbia, and a significant decrease in the combined outcome of death or BPD.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。