Assessment of different quantification metrics of [(18)F]-NaF PET/CT images of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm

对腹主动脉瘤患者的[(18)F]-NaF PET/CT图像的不同定量指标进行评估

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aim to assess the spill-in effect and the benefit in quantitative accuracy for [(18)F]-NaF PET/CT imaging of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) using the background correction (BC) technique. METHODS: Seventy-two datasets of patients diagnosed with AAA were reconstructed with ordered subset expectation maximization algorithm incorporating point spread function (PSF). Spill-in effect was investigated for the entire aneurysm (AAA), and part of the aneurysm excluding the region close to the bone (AAA(exc)). Quantifications of PSF and PSF+BC images using different thresholds (% of max. SUV in target regions-of-interest) to derive target-to-background (TBR) values (TBR(max), TBR(90), TBR(70) and TBR(50)) were compared at 3 and 10 iterations. RESULTS: TBR differences were observed between AAA and AAA(exc) due to spill-in effect from the bone into the aneurysm. TBR(max) showed the highest sensitivity to the spill-in effect while TBR(50) showed the least. The spill-in effect was reduced at 10 iterations compared to 3 iterations, but at the expense of reduced contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). TBR(50) yielded the best trade-off between increased CNR and reduced spill-in effect. PSF+BC method reduced TBR sensitivity to spill-in effect, especially at 3 iterations, compared to PSF (P-value ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: TBR(50) is robust metric for reduced spill-in and increased CNR.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。